Alternate West opened and closed public forum, as there was none.
6. OLD BUSINESS:
A.
Catalina Pointe - Final Site Plan - DRC Approval for the Final Site Plan-
SP25-0002
Jonathan Knight spoke regarding Final Site Plan application SP25-0002, for Catalina
Pointe Residential Planned Unit Development, a proposal to develop +36.6 acres
comprised of two properties located at 2965 Howland Boulevard and 1580 Catalina
Boulevard. The Final Site Plan application was received in March of 2025, and
completed two rounds of review. Staff deemed the Final Site Plan application to comply
with all standards established within the Catalina Pointe RPUD Development
Agreement. As a condition of this approval, the applicant shall submit a building permit
application for review and approval. Secondly, the applicant shall provide a detailed
construction phasing narrative prior to any horizontal construction.
Deputy Utility Director James Parrish presented corrections that needed to be made to
the Development Order as follows:
Section G5: The owner should contact Volusia County Utilities.
Section H3: Should reference the Volusia County Utilities department, not Del North.
Section 13A: All Florida Department of Environmental Protection application forms
submitted to the County of Volusia County utilities.
Section 13B: Specifications shall be submitted to Volusia County Utilities.
City Attorney Good recommended the Development Review Committee to approve and
accept the Catalina Pointe Residential Planned Unit Development SP25-0002, based on
the conditions stated by staff.
Motion by Matthew West, seconded by James Parrish to approve
Catalina Pointe at 2965 Howland Boulevard with conditions stated in the
development order and by the Development Review Committee. The
motion carried unanimously.
7. NEW BUSINESS:
A. 00 Sunday Drive - Rezone - Pre-Application
Applicant John Wanamaker presented the project, a site plan that was developed in
2006 that would accommodate a bank, general office and restaurant.
Alternate Knight provided the applicant with sections of the Land Development Code
regarding Final Site Plan requirements and fees. He recommended the applicant to
rezone to a commercial planned unit development.
Member Grosvenor informed the applicant that the restaurant building would have to be
protected by a fire sprinkler system if the occupancy should exceed 100.
The applicant expressed his intention to remove the restaurant from the site plan and
come up with an alternate use.